Case LawHigh Court › Pary Developers Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Co...

Pary Developers Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 5(1), Kolkata & Anr

High Court 13 Sep 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Pary Developers Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 5(1), Kolkata & Anr
Date of order
13 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Pary Developers Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 5(1), Kolkata & Anr, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

13.09.2021 p.b.Sl. No.7. W.P.A. 12403 of 2021 Pary Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 5(1), Kolkata & Anr. (Via Video Conference) Mr. Rajat Mittal,Ms. Sadupurna Mukherjee,Ms. Abhidipto Tarafdar. ……for the petitioner. Affidavit-of-service filed in court be kept on therecord. In this matter petitioner has challenged theimpugned notice dated 19[th] April, 2021 relating toassessment years 2014-2015 under Section 148 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 on the ground that before issuingnotice under Section 148 of the Act, mandatory provisionsof Section 148A of the Act which cast statutory obligationon the part of the Assessing Officer to comply theprovisions of the same before issuing any notice underSection 148 of the Act has not been complied with by theAssessing Officer. Petitioner has also challenged the Constitutionalvalidity of the provisions of the Taxation and other Law (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act,2020. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner insupport of his contention has relied on my order dated15[th] July, 2021 in WPA No.244 of 2021 in the case ofBagaria Properties and Investments Private Limited & Anr.vs. Union of India & Ors. on the similar issue where Ihave stayed the impugned notice under Section 148 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 for non compliance of the provisionsof Section 148A of the Act. The learned Advocate for the respondents is not ableto deny the allegations of the petitioner that Section 148Aprovisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was not compliedwith in this case before issuing notice under Section 148of the said Act and was not able to distinguish theaforesaid unreported decisions. Considering the submissions of the parties, I directthe respondents to file affidavit-in-opposition within sixweeks from date. Petitioner to file reply thereto, if any,within two weeks thereafter. List the matter for final hearing on 26.11.2021. In the meantime, respondents are restrained fromproceeding any further on the basis of the aforesaidimpugned notice dated 19[th] April, 2021 being Annexure P-1 to the writ petition. At the time of hearing, parties should be ready withshort written notes of argument. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan