Prognosis Securities Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 5/1 And Ors
High Court
12 May 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Prognosis Securities Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 5/1 And Ors
Date of order
12 May 2023
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Prognosis Securities Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 5/1 And Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
ORDER SHEET
WPO/990/2023IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE
PROGNOSIS SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITEDVSINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5/1 AND ORS
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Date: 12[th] May, 2023.
Appearance:Mr. Rites Goel, Adv.…For the Petitioner
Mr. Om Narayan Rai, Adv.Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv.…For the Respondents
The Court: Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
Affidavit of service filed in Court be kept with the records.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned orderdated 30[th] July, 2022 under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961relating to assessment year 2016-17 by raising the pure question of lawrelating to the jurisdiction of the assessing officer concerned in passing theaforesaid impugned order by non-compliance of the formalities of takingapproval of the specified authority mentioned in Section 151(ii) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961.
Admitted position in this case is that impugned order under Section148A(d) of the Act has been passed after a lapse of three years from the endof the relevant assessment year and in this case specified authority is notthe Principal Commissioner of Income Tax from whom approval has beentaken before passing the aforesaid impugned order and it appears on a plain
reading of Section 151(ii) of the said Act that Principal CIT from whomapproval has been taken is not the specified authority for the purpose ofapproval under Section 148 and Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, submission of theparties and the aforesaid factual and legal position, the aforesaid impugnedorder under Section 148A(d) of the Act dated 30[th] July, 2022 and allsubsequent proceedings are quashed.
However, quashing of the impugned order and subsequent proceedingswill not be a bar on the part of the Income Tax Authorities concerned toproceed further in accordance with law from the stage such irregularity hasbeen committed, after taking approval from the ‘specified authority’.
In view of the discussion and observation made above, this writpetition being WPO 990 of 2023 stands disposed of.
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
TR/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.