Rep. By Its Secretary L.mohamed Kasim v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax,Income Tax Department, National E- Assessment Center,Delhi
High Court
04 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Rep. By Its Secretary L.mohamed Kasim v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax,Income Tax Department, National E- Assessment Center,Delhi
Date of order
04 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Rep. By Its Secretary L.mohamed Kasim v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax,Income Tax Department, National E- Assessment Center,Delhi, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 144, Section 147, Section 148A, Section 246A of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: This Writ Petition is disposed of with above observations.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
W.P.(MD) No.15023 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04.06.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P.(MD) No.15023 of 2025
andW.M.P.(MD) No.11262 of 2025
Tvl Sivagangaii Nusrathul Masakeen Educational
and Research Society,
rep. by its Secretary L.Mohamed Kasim.
... Petitioner
Vs
1. The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax,Income Tax Department, National E- Assessment Center,Delhi.
2. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax Department,Madurai.Tamil Nadu.
3. The Assessment Officer,Non Corp, Ward - 1(5) Income Tax Department,No.2, Rathinasamy Nadar Road, C.R.Building, Bibikulam,Madurai - 2.
... Respondents
1/5
W.P.(MD) No.15023 of 2025
PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of first respondent vide PAN No. - ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/ 1061185268 (1) dated 20.02.2024 and quash the same as illegal as devoid of merits and direct the first respondent to redo the assessment for the year 2016-17 after providing reasonable opportunities to the petitioner, by following the due process of law.
For petitioner : Mr. Raja.Karthikeyan
For respondents: Mr.N.Dilip Kumar Standing Counsel *****
ORDER
This Writ Petition is disposed of at the time of admission itself.
2. Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents.
3. The petitioner has challenged the impugned assessment order dated 20.02.2024 passed by the first respondent. After the order came to be passed on
2/5
W.P.(MD) No.15023 of 2025
02.04.2022 under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the impugned order has been passed under Section 147 r/w Section 144 and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the petitioner had failed to reply to the notices that preceded the impugned order.
4. At this stage, there is a request in withdrawing the Writ Petition with liberty to file statutory appeal before the Appellate Authority under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
5. Recording the above submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of by
permitting the petitioner to file statutory appeal under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. If such appeal is filed before the Appellate Authority in such time, the Appellate Authority shall dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law without reference to limitation.
3/5
W.P.(MD) No.15023 of 2025
7. This Writ Petition is disposed of with above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Index : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / Noapd
04.06.2025
4/5
5/5
W.P.(MD) No.15023 of 2025
C.SARAVANAN, J. apd
W.P.(MD) No.15023 of 2025
04.06.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.