Case LawHigh Court › Ross Electrical Works Pvt. Ltd v. Income...

Ross Electrical Works Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward

High Court 19 Sep 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Ross Electrical Works Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward
Date of order
19 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ross Electrical Works Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

19.9.2022 ks WPA 19281 of 2022 sl. 10 Ross Electrical Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward No.10(1), Kolkata & Ors. Mr. Abhrotosh Mazumder,Mr. Avra Majumder,Mr. D. Ray,Mr. B. Gupta … For the Petitioner.Mr. Aryak Dutt … For the UOI. Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged theimpugned order dated 22[nd] July, 2022, under Section148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relating toassessment year 2016-2017 on the basis of impugnednotice under Section 148A(b) of the Act dated 2[nd]June, 2022 against which an elaborateobjection/response was filed by the petitioner beingAnnexure P-11 to the writ petition which was servedupon the department on 20[th] June, 2022. On perusalof the aforesaid objections/response, I find that thepetitioner has raised a very pertinent legal issue ofjurisdiction of the Assessing Officer concerned ininitiating the impugned proceedings by applying theamended provisions of Section 149(1)(b) of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 which came into effect prospectivelyfrom 1[st] of April, 2022 after the order of the Hon’bleSupreme Court. I find from the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Act that it has not been properlydealt with or discussed by taking into considerationthe aforesaid amended provisions of Section 149(1)(b)of the Act which came into effect prospectively from 1[st]of April, 2022 which prima facie appears to haveapplied in the case of the petitioner retrospectively. Accordingly, the aforesaid impugned order dated22[nd] July, 2022 under Section 148A(d) of the Act andsubsequent notice under Section 148A(b) are set asideand the matter is remanded back to the AssessingOfficer concerned to pass a fresh order in accordancewith law by passing a reasoned and speaking orderafter giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioneror its authorised representative and after taking intoconsideration the observation made in this order aswell as by taking into consideration the aforesaidnewly amended provision which came into effectprospectively from 1[st] of April, 2022. With this observation and direction, this writpetition being WPA 19281 of 2022 is disposed of. ( Md. Nizamuddin, J. )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan