Case LawHigh Court › Sahaj Fashions Ltd v. Assistant Commissi...

Sahaj Fashions Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle

High Court 20 Jul 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Sahaj Fashions Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle
Date of order
20 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sahaj Fashions Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4901/2022 Sahaj Fashions Ltd., having its Registered Office At 1, ShreeBhawan 1, Ajmer Road, Madanganj, Kishangarh, Ajmer,Rajasthan through its Director Sh. Rohit Tosniwal. ----Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2, Ajmer, CRBuilding, Opposite Sessions Court, Jaipur Road, Ajmer,Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Javed Khan Advocate. For Respondent: Mrs. Parinitoo Jain Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA 20/07/2022 Order Mrs. Parinitoo Jain, learned counsel enters appearanceon behalf of the respondent. When this case came up for hearing today, learnedcounsel for the parties jointly submitted that the issue raised inthis petition would be covered by order dated 04.05.2022 passedby the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India & Others Vs. Ashish Agarwal (Civil Appeal No. 3005/2022 andbatch of appeals). Following directions have been issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid case:“10. In view of the above and for the reasonsstated above, the present Appeals are ALLOWEDIN PART. The impugned common judgments andorders passed by the High Court of Judicature atAllahabad in W.T. No. 524/2021 and other allied“10. In view of the above and for the reasonsstated above, the present Appeals are ALLOWEDIN PART. The impugned common judgments andorders passed by the High Court of Judicature atAllahabad in W.T. No. 524/2021 and other allied tax appeals/petitions, is/are hereby modified andsubstituted as under:- (i) The impugned section 148 notices issued to therespective assessees which were issued underunamended section 148 of the IT Act, which werethe subject matter of writ petitions before thevarious respective High Courts shall be deemed tohave been issued under section 148A of the IT Actas substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 andconstrued or treated to be show-cause notices interms of section 148A(b). The assessing officershall, within thirty days from today provide to therespective assessees information and materialrelied upon by the Revenue, so that the assesseescan reply to the show-cause notices within twoweeks thereafter; (ii) The requirement of conducting any enquiry, ifrequired, with the prior approval of specifiedauthority under section 148A(a) is herebydispensed with as a one-time measure vis-à-visthose notices which have been issued undersection 148 of the unamended Act from01.04.2021 till date, including those which havebeen quashed by the High Courts. Even otherwise as observed hereinaboveholding any enquiry with the prior approval ofspecified authority is not mandatory but it is forthe concerned Assessing Officer to hold anyenquiry, if required; (iii) The assessing officers shall thereafter passorders in terms of section 148A(d) in respect ofeach of the concerned assessees; Thereafter afterfollowing the procedure as required under section148A may issue notice under section 148 (assubstituted); (iv) All defences which may be available to theassessees including those available under section149 of the IT Act and all rights and contentionswhich may be available to the concernedassessees and Revenue under the Finance Act,2021 and in law shall continue to be available. 11. The present order shall be applicable PANINDIA and all judgments and orders passed bydifferent High Courts on the issue and under whichsimilar notices which were issued after 01.04.2021issued under section 148 of the Act are set asideand shall be governed by the present order andshall stand modified to the aforesaid extent. Thepresent order is passed in exercise of powers (iv) All defences which may be available to theassessees including those available under section149 of the IT Act and all rights and contentionswhich may be available to the concernedassessees and Revenue under the Finance Act,2021 and in law shall continue to be available. 11. The present order shall be applicable PANINDIA and all judgments and orders passed bydifferent High Courts on the issue and under whichsimilar notices which were issued after 01.04.2021issued under section 148 of the Act are set asideand shall be governed by the present order andshall stand modified to the aforesaid extent. Thepresent order is passed in exercise of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India so asto avoid any further appeals by the Revenue onthe very issue by challenging similar judgmentsand orders, with a view not to burden this Courtwith approximately 9000 appeals. We alsoobserve that present order shall also govern thepending writ petitions, pending before variousHigh Courts in which similar notices under Section148 of the Act issued after 01.04.2021 are underchallenge. 12. The impugned common judgments and orderspassed by the High Court of Allahabad and thesimilar judgments and orders passed by variousHigh Courts, more particularly, the respectivejudgments and orders passed by the various HighCourts particulars of which are mentionedhereinabove, shall stand modified/substituted tothe aforesaid extent only. All these appeals are accordingly partlyallowed to the aforesaid extent. In the facts of the case, there shall be noorder as to costs.” Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that in compliance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble SupremeCourt, notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (forshort ‘the Act of 1961’) issued to the petitioner is being processedunder Section 148A of the Act of 1961 and reply of the petitionerhas also been filed and the matter would be decided in accordancewith law. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that inthe meantime, the assessment order has also been passed. In view of the aforesaid judgment of the Hon’bleSupreme Court, the assessment order, if any passed, will lose itsefficacy. However, the further course of action would depend uponthe order that may be ultimately passed by the authority underSection 148A(d) of the Act of 1961. Accordingly, this writ petition is also finally disposed offin terms of order dated 04.05.2022 passed by the Hon’bleSupreme Court in the case of Union of India & Others Vs.Ashish Agarwal (supra), as stated above. The authorities concerned shall proceed to decide thematter in accordance with the directions issued by the Hon’bleSupreme Court in para 10 of the aforesaid order. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J MANOJ NARWANI /46
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan