Santosh Kumar Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward Karauli
High Court
06 Dec 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Santosh Kumar Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward Karauli
Date of order
06 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Santosh Kumar Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward Karauli, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: With liberty to the petitioner to raise all the grounds asraised in the present writ petition, this writ petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16582/2022
Santosh Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Nathua Lal Gupta, aged about 41years, R/o E-50, Mohan Nagar, Hospital Road, Hindaun City,Karauli 322230
----Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward Karauli having its address at Plot No.62-65, Adarsh Nagar, Near Masalpur Chungi Naka, HindaunRoad, Karauli.
----Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Siddharth Ranka Advocate with Ms. Apeksha Bapna Advocate.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
06/12/2022
Heard.
Challenge to order passed by the assessing authorityunder Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is mainlybased on wrong appreciation of material on record.
Present is not a case where the order has beenchallenged on the ground that the authority which passed theorder had no jurisdiction and was not authorised under the law todecide the matter. It is also not a case where the order has beenchallenged on any ground of procedural impropriety or non-affording of opportunity of hearing. Therefore, in suchcircumstances, irrespective of the petitioner having a case ofappreciation of material on record, we are not inclined to interfere
with the order in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India as the petitioner would have appropriateremedy at further stages of assessment to satisfy the authoritywith reference to the material on record that no further income isliable to be included in respect of the concerned assessment year.
With liberty to the petitioner to raise all the grounds asraised in the present writ petition, this writ petition is dismissed.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J
MANOJ NARWANI /13
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.