Case LawHigh Court › Shivdarbar Marketing Private Limited v....

Shivdarbar Marketing Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 5/1 And Ors

High Court 08 Jun 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Shivdarbar Marketing Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 5/1 And Ors
Date of order
08 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shivdarbar Marketing Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 5/1 And Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

ORDER SHEETWPO/1127/2023IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE SHIVDARBAR MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITEDVSINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 5/1 AND ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN Date: 8[th] June, 2023. Appearance:Mr. Rites Goel, Adv.…For the PetitionerMr. Tilok Mitra, Adv.…For the Respondents The Court: Heard the learned advocates appearing for the parties. Supplementary affidavit and affidavit of service filed in Court be keptwith the record. By this writ petition petitioner has challenged the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 29[th] July, 2022relating to assessment year 2016-17 on the ground of violation of principlesof natural justice and the order being a non-speaking order not at all dealingwith any of the objections raised by the petitioner by its representationdated 3[rd] June, 2022 being annexure P-6 to the writ petition. I have perused the aforesaid impugned order. I find that the allegationof the petitioner that the order being a non-speaking order and not at alldealt with the objections/contentions raised by the petitioner in its aforesaidobjection, is substantially correct. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissionsof the parties, this writ petition being WPO 1127 of 2023 is disposed of by setting aside the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Act andall subsequent proceedings and by remanding the matter back to theassessing officer concerned for passing a reasoned and speaking order afterdealing with the objections raised by the petitioner in its aforesaidrepresentation and after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner,within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of thisorder. (MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.) TR/
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan