Case LawHigh Court › Shroff Chemicals Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant/D...

Shroff Chemicals Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant/Deputy Commissionerof Income Tax, Circle-11(1), Kolkata & Ors

High Court 29 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Shroff Chemicals Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant/Deputy Commissionerof Income Tax, Circle-11(1), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
29 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Shroff Chemicals Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant/Deputy Commissionerof Income Tax, Circle-11(1), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Issue: Furthermore, on perusal of theaforesaid impugned order dated 29[th] July, 2022, I find thatthere is no reference or mentioning of the petitioner’srequest for personal hearing as to whether it has beenconsidered or rejected.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

29.11.2022. p.b.Sl. No.21. WPA 23833 of 2022 Shroff Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant/Deputy CommissionerOf Income Tax, Circle-11(1), Kolkata & Ors. Mr. Avra Mazumder,Ms. Megha Agarwal,Mr. Binayak Gupta,Mr. Suman Bhowmik. ……..for the petitioner. Mr. Aryak Dutt. ……..for the respondent. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged theimpugned order dated 29[th] July, 2022 under Section148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating toassessment year 2015-2016, on the ground of violation ofprinciples of natural justice by denying the petitioneropportunity of hearing in spite of making specific requestby its objection dated 7[th] June, 2022 being Annexure P-2of the writ petition. Furthermore, on perusal of theaforesaid impugned order dated 29[th] July, 2022, I find thatthere is no reference or mentioning of the petitioner’srequest for personal hearing as to whether it has beenconsidered or rejected. Mr. Dutt, learned advocate appearing for therespondents is not in a position to satisfy as to whetherpersonal hearing to the petitioner was given or not. Considering the facts and circumstances of this casethis writ petition being WPA 23833 of 2022 is disposed ofby setting aside the aforesaid impugned order dated 29[th]July, 2022 without going into the merit of the same and itis set aside only on the ground of violation of principles ofnatural justice and the matter is remanded back to pass afresh speaking order in accordance with law after giving anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner or its authorizedrepresentations within eight weeks from the date ofcommunication of this order and also to consider therequest made by the petitioner in its aforesaidletter/objection. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan