Case LawHigh Court › Sl v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income T...

Sl v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4(3), Kolkata & Ors

High Court 30 Jun 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Sl v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4(3), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
30 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
2018-2019
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Sl v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4(3), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of discussion made above even without calling for affidavits from the respondents which according to me is not required since this writ petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy without going into the merit of the impugned assessment order.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

WPA 14155 OF 2023 30.06.2023 GSP Piling Constructions Private Limited Sl no. 17 Ct no. 2 - Vs – Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-4(3), Kolkata & Ors. P.M. Ms. Sutapa Roy Chaudhury, Ms. Aratrika Roy … for the petitioner Mr. Vipul Kundalia, Mr. Prithu Dudhoria … for the respondents. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition petitioner has challenged both the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relating to assessment year 2018-2019 and subsequent final assessment order under Section 147 of the Act dated 31[st] March, 2023 on legality of the merit of the impugned assessment order which is an appellable order under the statute. Petitioner could not point out any procedural irregularity or illegality in the proceeding subsequent to the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act and in passing the final assessment order under Section 147 of the Act or that the aforesaid final assessment order was passed without granting any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. On perusal of the impugned assessment under Section 147 of the Act I find that it contains detailed reasoning based on facts and evidences and this Court in exercise of its constitutional writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot act as an assessing officer or an appellate authority to reappreciate those evidences and findings and substitute with its own in addition statutory alternative remedy by way of appeal is available to the petitioner. In view of discussion made above even without calling for affidavits from the respondents which according to me is not required since this writ petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy without going into the merit of the impugned assessment order. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan