Case LawHigh Court › Sl v. P.m. Assistant Commissioner Of Inc...

Sl v. P.m. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 7(1), Kolkata & Ors

High Court 26 Jun 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Sl v. P.m. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 7(1), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
26 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
2019-2020
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Sl v. P.m. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 7(1), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Decision: With this observation and direction this writ petition being WPA 11323 of 2023 is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

WPA 11323 OF 2023 26.06.2023 Sl no. 3 Gopal Kumar Agarwala Ct no. 2 - Vs - P.M. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 7(1), Kolkata & Ors. Mr. Abhratosh Majumder, Sr. Adv. Mr. Avra Mazumder, Mr. Ramesh Kr. Patodia, Ms. Megha Agarwal, Mr. Suman Bhowmik, Mr. Kausheyo Roy, Mr. Samrat Das … for the petitioner Mr. Vipul Kundalia, Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Mr. Anurag Roy … for the Income Tax authorities. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition petitioner has challenged the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Act dated 8[th] April, 2023 relating to the assessment year 2019-2020 on the ground of violation of principle of natural justice by the assessing officer concerned in not furnishing the documents relied upon by him which was specifically asked for by the petitioner by its petition dated 21[st] March, 2023 in response to the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act. The Assessing Officer in the aforesaid impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Act has recorded that no response was given in spite of providing them the relevant documents at their e-mail address. It is the case of the petitioner that the e-mail address referred in the impugned order is not the e-mail address of the petitioner for the purpose of any correspondence which appeared from one of the orders under Section 143(1) of the Act itself where the e-mail address of the petitioner has been recorded and in the said address petitioner did not receive any relevant documents asked for by its submission dated 21[st] March, 2023. Without going into the merits of the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Act, since the petitioner itself wants to participate in the impugned proceeding on condition of furnishing of the documents asked for by its submission dated 21[st]March, 2023 which were not supplied to them at their e-mail address and in view of admitted position that later on the same were received by the petitioner through its accountant, in the interest of justice the aforesaid impugned order dated 8[th] April, 2023 is set aside by directing the petitioner to file response/reply, if any, to the documents relied upon which have been received by the petitioner through its accountant, within a period of two weeks from date and if such response/reply is filed by the petitioner within the time stipulated herein the Assessing Officer concerned shall consider the said response/reply and pass a fresh order under Section 148A(d) of the Act after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or its authorized representatives within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of such reply. In case of failure on the part of the petitioner to give reply/response as indicated herein above within the time stipulated herein in that event this order of setting aside of the aforesaid impugned order will not have any force. With this observation and direction this writ petition being WPA 11323 of 2023 is disposed of. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan