Suresh Kumar Gupta v. Income Tax Officer Ward 40/1 And Ors
High Court
15 May 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Suresh Kumar Gupta v. Income Tax Officer Ward 40/1 And Ors
Date of order
15 May 2023
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Suresh Kumar Gupta v. Income Tax Officer Ward 40/1 And Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
OD –4
ORDER SHEET
WPO/933/2023IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE
SURESH KUMAR GUPTA
VS
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 40/1 AND ORS
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Date: 15[th] May, 2023.
Appearance:Mr. Rites Goel, Adv.…For the PetitionerMr. Vipul Kundalia, Adv.Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv.…For the Respondents
The Court: Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned orderdated 8[th] April, 2023 under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961relating to assessment year 2016-17 inter alia on the ground of violation ofprinciples of natural justice by not providing any opportunity of personalhearing in spite of specifically asking for the same as appears from record.
Mr. Kundalia, learned advocate representing the respondent IncomeTax Authority fairly concedes the aforesaid allegation of the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissionof the parties, this writ petition being WPO 933 of 2023 is disposed of bysetting aside the aforesaid impugned order dated 8[th] April, 2023 andsubsequent proceedings and the matter is remanded back to the assessingofficer concerned to pass fresh order in accordance with law after providing
opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner or his authorisedrepresentative within two weeks from the date of communication of thisorder and pass a final order within six weeks from the date ofcommunication of this order.
It is needless to mention that no adjournment shall be granted to thepetitioner.
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
TR/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.