The Grob Tea Company Limited v. Assistant/Deputy Commissioner Of Income
High Court
28 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
The Grob Tea Company Limited v. Assistant/Deputy Commissioner Of Income
Date of order
28 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Grob Tea Company Limited v. Assistant/Deputy Commissioner Of Income, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: With this observation and direction this writ petition being WPA 23141 of 2022 is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
28.11.2022 Sl no. 22 Ct no. 2 P.M.
WPA 23141 OF 2022
The Grob Tea Company Limited. - Vs -
Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Income
Tax, Circle 4(1) & Ors.
Mr. Avra Mazumder, Ms. Megha Agarwal, Mr. Binayak Gupta
… for the petitioner.
Mr. Om Narayan Rai
… for the State.
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 28[th] July, 2022 and subsequent notice on the ground of violation of principle of natural justice by not providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in spite of specifically asking by it.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and even without going into the merits of the aforesaid impugned order, only on the ground of violation of principle of natural justice the aforesaid impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officer concerned to pass a fresh speaking order in accordance with law
after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or its authorized representatives within eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.
With this observation and direction this writ petition being WPA 23141 of 2022 is disposed of.
(Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.