Case LawHigh Court › Tirupati Commercial v. Income Tax Office...

Tirupati Commercial v. Income Tax Officer, Ward- 43(1), Kolkata & Ors

High Court 01 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Tirupati Commercial v. Income Tax Officer, Ward- 43(1), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
01 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Tirupati Commercial v. Income Tax Officer, Ward- 43(1), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

1.8.2022 ks sl. 9 ks WPA 9145 of 2022 Tirupati Commercial Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward- 43(1), Kolkata & Ors. Mr. Sandip Choraria,Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee,Mr. Gobinda Dey … For the Petitioner.Mrs. Smita Das De … For the Respondents. Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged theimpugned order dated 31[st] March, 2022, underSection 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 whichwas passed on the basis of notice dated 10[th] of March,2022 under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act,1961 by which petitioner was asked to give response tothe said notice by 18[th] March, 2022. It is the case ofthe petitioner that petitioner has filed the response tothe said notice on 24[th] March, 2022, which has notbeen considered at all at the time of passing theimpugned order on 31[st] March, 2022. On perusal of the aforesaid impugned order dated31[st] March, 2022, I find that it is totally non-speakingone line order lacking any reason for rejection of thepetitioner’s response to the notice under Section148A(b) of the Act. Considering the facts and circumstances of thecase and submission of the parties, the impugned order dated 31[st] March, 2022 under Section 148A(d) ofthe Act is set aside and the matter is remanded backto the Assessing Officer concerned to pass a freshreasoned and speaking order in accordance with lawand after considering the petitioner’s aforesaidresponse/objection filed on 24[th] March, 2022, withinfour weeks from date. With this observation and direction this writpetition being WPA 9145 of 2022 is disposed of. ( Md. Nizamuddin, J. )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan