Case LawHigh Court › T.m.subash Thangam v. The Income Tax Off...

T.m.subash Thangam v. The Income Tax Officer Non Corp Ward 17(7), Non Corp Ward 17(7

High Court 20 Jun 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
T.m.subash Thangam v. The Income Tax Officer Non Corp Ward 17(7), Non Corp Ward 17(7
Date of order
20 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In T.m.subash Thangam v. The Income Tax Officer Non Corp Ward 17(7), Non Corp Ward 17(7, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: It is not known as to whether these proceedings span all the financial years referred to in the prayer, as notice and order placed in the typed set relates to only some of the years.

Decision: For the aforesaid reasons, the prayer for mandamus is rejected, and this Writ Petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 20.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.No.17952 of 2023 T.M.Subash Thangam ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Income Tax Officer Non Corp Ward 17(7), Non Corp Ward 17(7), Income Tax Department, Room No.417, BSNL Building, 4th Floor, Income Tax Office, BSNL Tower, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 2.The Income Tax Officer Intl Tax Ward 2(2), Income Tax Department, Room No.417, BSNL Building, 4th Floor, Income Tax Office, BSNL Tower, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 3.National Faceless Assessment Centre Income Tax Department, Room No.417, BSNL Building, 4th Floor, Income Tax Office, BSNL Tower, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 4.The Punjab National Bank, Rep by its Branch Manager, Wandoor Branch, Sai Building, Manjeri Road, Opp. Panchayat Office, Wandoor, Malapuram District - 679 328, Kerala State. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct enquiry on the petitioner's representation dated 22.04.2023 by taking note of the Letter of the 4th respondent dated 17.04.2023 and drop all further proceedings as against the petitioner on the basis of the notices issued by the respondents 1 to 3 under provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and its Rules for the Financial Years of 2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019-2020 & 2020-2021. For Petitioner : Mr.A.IlayaperumalFor Respondents: Dr.B.Ramaswamy Senior Standing Counsel (for R1 to R3) O R D E R Dr.Ramasamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice for R1 to R3 and is armed with necessary instructions to enable a final disposal of this matter, even at the stage of admission. In light of order that is proposed to be passed in this matter, no notice is thought necessary to R4, Punjab National Bank (in short 'Bank'). https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17952 of 2023 2. The petitioner, an individual, seeks a mandamus directing the conduct of enquiry on the petitioner's representation dated 22.04.2023 taking note of the letter of the Bank dated 17.04.2023 and dropping all further proceedings as against the petitioner on the basis of the notices issued by the official respondents under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'Act') for the Financial Years of 2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019-2020 and 2020-2021. 3. The prayer appears to be misconceived. A perusal of the compilation accompanying the writ affidavit reveals that the petitioner has been in receipt of notice under Section 148A(b) dated 23.03.2022 and also suffered an order under Section 148A(d) of the Act dated 05.04.2022. It is not known as to whether these proceedings span all the financial years referred to in the prayer, as notice and order placed in the typed set relates to only some of the years. 4. Be that as it may, learned counsel is also unclear as to whether any order of assessment has been passed for the periods in question. 5. The petitioner has also placed on record a letter dated 03.04.2023 addressed to the Punjab National Bank seeking some clarifications in regard to the financial years 2017-18 to 2020-21, particularly relating to a sum of Rs.15,59,38,000/- that have taken place https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17952 of 2023 utilising his pan number. In conclusion, the petitioner has sought a letter from the Bank to the effect that he is not connected to the bank accounts through which the aforesaid transactions have taken place. 6. There is a certificate from Punjab National Bank dated 17.04.2023 to the effect that certain bank accounts stand in the name of KK Steels and Building materials, a proprietory concern and that the pan number of the petitioner is not connected to those bank accounts. 03.04.2023 addressed to the Punjab National Bank seeking some clarifications in regard to the financial years 2017-18 to 2020-21, particularly relating to a sum of Rs.15,59,38,000/- that have taken place https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17952 of 2023 utilising his pan number. In conclusion, the petitioner has sought a letter from the Bank to the effect that he is not connected to the bank accounts through which the aforesaid transactions have taken place. 6. There is a certificate from Punjab National Bank dated 17.04.2023 to the effect that certain bank accounts stand in the name of KK Steels and Building materials, a proprietory concern and that the pan number of the petitioner is not connected to those bank accounts. 7. Be that as it may, thsese are factual aspects of the matter that this Court cannot look into in Article 226 of the Constitution of India. That apart, as the petitioner appears to have suffered orders under Section 148A(d) of the Act that have attained finality and is also in receipt of notices under Section 148 of the Act, it is for it to cooperate with the proceedings initiated by the Department and take matters to a logical conclusion, in accordance with law. 8. It is the submission of the learned Standing Counsel that notices have been issued continuously and repeatedly to the petitioner but there has been no response from his side. It is incumbent on the part of the petitioner to appear before the Officer and put forth any explanation that he may have in regard to the issues raised by the W.P.No.17952 of 2023 Department including the transactions as noticed in the preceding paragraphs that have been conducted utilising his pan number. 9. Mandamus of the nature as sought for cannot be granted in a case such as this which involves appreciation of various disputed facts. It is to be noted that in matters relating to assessment, filing of a representation is of no avail as the petitioner is duty bound to respond to notices, appear before the officer and tender his explanations. 10. For the aforesaid reasons, the prayer for mandamus is rejected, and this Writ Petition is dismissed. The petitioner will appear in response to notices, cooperate with the Department and the proceedings for assessment will be carried forward in accorance with law. No costs. 20.06.2023 Index : Yes / NoSpeaking/non-speaking Order Neutral citation:Yes/Nosl Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J. sl To 1.The Income Tax Officer Non Corp Ward 17(7), Income Tax Department, Room No.417, BSNL Building, 4th Floor, Income Tax Office, BSNL Tower, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 2.The Income Tax Officer Intl Tax Ward 2(2), Income Tax Department, Room No.417, BSNL Building, 4th Floor, Income Tax Office, BSNL Tower, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 3.National Faceless Assessment Centre Income Tax Department, Room No.417, BSNL Building, 4th Floor, Income Tax Office, BSNL Tower, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 4.The Punjab National Bank, Rep by its Branch Manager, Wandoor Branch, Sai Building, Manjeri Road, Opp. Panchayat Office, Wandoor, Malapuram District - 679 328, Kerala State. W.P.No.17952 of 2023 20.06.2023
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan