Toran Vyapar Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer 8(1), Kolkata & Ors
High Court
20 Jun 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Toran Vyapar Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer 8(1), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
20 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Toran Vyapar Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer 8(1), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Ample opportunity was given to the petitionerbefore passing order under Section 148A(d) as well asunder the Section 147 of the Act and also in view ofthe nature of allegation against the business in whichit is involved as well as in view of the fact that theimpugned assessment order under Section 14...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
20.6.2023
ks WPA 11623 of 2023
sl. 9
Toran Vyapar Private Limited
Vs Income Tax Officer 8(1), Kolkata & Ors.
Mr. Avra Mazumder,Mr. Ramesh Kr. Patodia,Ms. Megha Agarwal,Mr. Suman Bhowmik,Mr. Samrat Das … For the Petitioner.Mr. Om Narayan Rai,Mr. Amit Sharma … For the Respondents.
Supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner bekept with the record.
Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged theimpugned order under Section 148A(d) of the IncomeTax Act, 1961, dated 30[th] July, 2022, relating to theassessment year 2014-15 and subsequent order dated30[th] May, 2023 under Section 147 read with Section144 of the Act. I find that after the order underSection 148A(d), series of notices under Section 142(1)and show-cause-notices were issued to the petitionerbut none was complied with by the petitioner. Onperusal of the impugned order under Section 148A(d)of the Act I find that there is a recording by theAssessing Officer based on enquiry and evidence thatthe Assessee/petitioner received Rs.1,14,76,009/- asaccommodation entry from several entities which
appears from the closing balance of sundry debtors inthe books of those entities in the guise of bogusbills/unsecured loans/share capital without anybusiness trading during the relevant financial year2013-14. I also find that there was no proceduralirregularity in passing the order under Section 147 ofthe Act. Ample opportunity was given to the petitionerbefore passing order under Section 148A(d) as well asunder the Section 147 of the Act and also in view ofthe nature of allegation against the business in whichit is involved as well as in view of the fact that theimpugned assessment order under Section 147 of theAct is an appealable order, I am not inclined toentertain this writ petition being WPA 11621 of 2023and accordingly the same is dismissed.
However, dismissal of this writ petition and anyobservation made in this order will not have anyimpact in the appeal, if petitioner chooses to fileagainst the aforesaid impugned assessment order,within a period of 15 days from date the same shall beconsidered on merits and the Appellate Authority willnot raise the point of limitation and also the petitionerwill be entitled to take points in the said appeal to befiled which have been raised in this writ petition.
( Md. Nizamuddin, J. )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.