Case Law › High Court › Value Infracon India Pvt Ltd v. Ram Giri...

Value Infracon India Pvt Ltd v. Ram Girish, Income Tax

High Court 12 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

12 Sep 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Value Infracon India Pvt Ltd v. Ram Girish, Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.Subject to the aforesaid, the contempt petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 148A case law →

$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1458/2024 VALUE INFRACON INDIA PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Tiwari, Mr. Kumar Deepraj, Ms. Arushi Rathore and Mr. Rachit Gupta, Advocates. versus RAM GIRISH, INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, SSC with Mr. Gibran Naushad, Ms. Sakashi Shairwal, JSCs. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA O R D E R % 12.09.2024 1.Mr. Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions states that the demand notice of 09 August 2024 has been withdrawn by the respondents. Insofar as the Show Cause Notice of 21 August 2024 is concerned, we note that the same is not a demand for tax payable but one which is referrable to Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2.In view of the aforesaid, we accord liberty to the writ petitioner to move an appropriate amendment application in the present writ petition, if so chosen and advised. 3.Subject to the aforesaid, the contempt petition stands disposed of. YASHWANT VARMA, J. SEPTEMBER 12, 2024/vp RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.