Veerasamy Mangalakumar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
23 Feb 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Veerasamy Mangalakumar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
23 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Veerasamy Mangalakumar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Issue: Since the Writ Petition was filed in February 2024, on the previous hearing, I directed the petitioner to obtain instructions as to whether the petitioner would proceed with the re-assessment proceedings by raising all objections in the course of such proceedings.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.02.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.P.No.3868 of 2024
and W.M.P.Nos.4183, 4185 & 4187 of 2024
Veerasamy Mangalakumar ... Petitioner
-vs-
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Non Corporate Circle-2,Coimbatore-641 018
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent in PAN: and quash the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 19.04.2022 in DIN & Notice No.ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1042771053(1) and the consequential notice u/s.148 of the Act dated 19.04.2022 in DIN & Notice No.ITBA/AST/S/148-1/2022-23/1042771627(1) for the assessment year 2018-19.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkatanarayanan for
M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar Padmanabhan
For Respondents : Ms.S.Premalatha, jr.sc
1/5
**********
W.P.No.3868 of 2024
ORDER
The petitioner assails an order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961(the I-T Act) and the consequential notice under Section 148 thereof.
2.The above mentioned order under Section 148A(d) was issued on 19.04.2022 and the consequential notice was also issued on the same day. The admitted position is that the petitioner replied to the notice under Section 148 and participated in re-assessment proceedings. Since the Writ Petition was filed in February 2024, on the previous hearing, I directed the petitioner to obtain instructions as to whether the petitioner would proceed with the re-assessment proceedings by raising all objections in the course of such proceedings.
2/5
W.P.No.3868 of 2024
3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to do so, provided all the objections are taken into consideration and the Assessing Officer is further directed to take into account the earlier order of this Court in Dr.Mathew Cherian V. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (2023) 151 taxmann.com 154(Madras) and the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai dated 12.04.2023 in Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Coimbatore V. M/s.Kovai Medical Centre and Hospital Limited, 99, Avinashi Road, Coimbatore, ITA No.1004/Chny/2022.
4.In view of the above submissions, it is not necessary to adjudicate this petition on merits. Instead, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the Assessing Officer to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including a personal hearing, take into consideration all contentions and objections of the
petitioner, including objections relating to jurisdiction and limitation, the precedents placed on record by the petitioner and
3/5
thereafter issue a reasoned assessment order.
5. W.P.No.3868 of 2024 is disposed of on the above terms. No
costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.4183, 4185 & 4187 of 2024 are
closed.
dnIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / NoNeutral Citation: Yes / No
23.02.2024
To
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Non Corporate Circle-2,Coimbatore-641 018
4/5
5/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.3868 of 2024
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,Jdn
W.P.No.3868 of 2024
and W.M.P.Nos.4183, 4185 & 4187 of 2024
23.02.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.