Venkateshwara Rao v. Ncome Tax Officer And
High Court
27 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhckalaburagi
Parties
Venkateshwara Rao v. Ncome Tax Officer And
Date of order
27 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Venkateshwara Rao v. Ncome Tax Officer And, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, I pass the following: ORDER 4$The Writ Petition is allowed, 44$A|certiorarl ISissued,tne|noticedated|29.03.2021 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A is.quashed.29.03.2021 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A is.quashed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signed byBASALINGAPPASHIVARAJDHUTTARGAONLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
NC: 2024:KHC-K:7468WP No. 201050 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 |
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ;WRIT PETITION NO. 201050 OF 2024 (TIT)BETWEEN:
SANKURATRI VENKATESHWARA RAO|S/O LATE VENKANNAH.NO. 1-11-55/138/6/7,NEAR LINGASUGURU ROAD,VENKATESHWARA COLONY,RAICHUR-584101.
_ PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR S.V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.INCOME TAX OFFICER
WARD-1, OPP. AIYAPPA TEMPLE,
UDAYANAGAR,RAICHUR-584101.RAICHUR-584101.
2DNATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTREADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER,ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER,
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE,ROOM NO. 401, 2ND FLOOR,E-RAMBP,JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM,DELHI-110003.MINISTRY OF FINANCE,ROOM NO. 401, 2ND FLOOR,E-RAMBP,JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM,DELHI-110003.
3.THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCR BUILDING,|QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU-560001.CR BUILDING,|QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU-560001.
NC: 2024:KHC-K:7468WP No. 201050 of 2024
RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. THIRUMALESH., ADVOVCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 22726 AND 27OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF|CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF|CERTIORARI QUASHING THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE)ACT DATED 29-03-2021 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-21/1031888854(1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 FOR THE|ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE -A.
THIS|WRIT PETITION, COMING ONFOR PRELIMINARYHEARING IN “B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ]
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1.The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the
following reliefs:
J Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature Of|a writ of Certiorari quashing the notice under|Section 148 of the Act dated 29.03.2021 bearing|DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-21/1031888854(1).issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment|year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A;a writ of Certiorari quashing the notice under|Section 148 of the Act dated 29.03.2021 bearing|DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-21/1031888854(1).issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment|year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A;
,.Issue a Writ of Certiorari or direction tn the neture|of writ of Certiorari quashing the order under|Section 148A(b) of the Act dated 26.05.2022|bearingDIN|No. ITBA/COM/F/17/202223/1043182653(1) issued by the respondent No.1.for the assessment year 2015-16 herein marked asAnnexure-Al.of writ of Certiorari quashing the order under|Section 148A(b) of the Act dated 26.05.2022|bearingDIN|No. ITBA/COM/F/17/202223/1043182653(1) issued by the respondent No.1.for the assessment year 2015-16 herein marked asAnnexure-Al.
3.Issue a writ of certiorari or direction in the nature of|writ of Certiorari quashing the notice under Section148A(d) of the Act dated 21.07.2022 bearing DIN|writ of Certiorari quashing the notice under Section148A(d) of the Act dated 21.07.2022 bearing DIN|
No. ITBA/COM/F/1 7/2022-23/1043976529(1)issued by the respondent No.1 for the assessment|year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-Az2.
4 Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature Of|writ of Certiorari quashing the notice U/s 148 of theActdated21,07.70727bearingNo. ITBA/AST/M/148_1/2022-23/1043986651(1) issuedby the respondent No.1 for the assessment year|2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A3.writ of Certiorari quashing the notice U/s 148 of theActdated21,07.70727bearingNo. ITBA/AST/M/148_1/2022-23/1043986651(1) issuedby the respondent No.1 for the assessment year|2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A3.
No. ITBA/COM/F/1 7/2022-23/1043976529(1)issued by the respondent No.1 for the assessment|year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-Az2.
4 Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature Of|writ of Certiorari quashing the notice U/s 148 of theActdated21,07.70727bearingNo. ITBA/AST/M/148_1/2022-23/1043986651(1) issuedby the respondent No.1 for the assessment year|2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A3.writ of Certiorari quashing the notice U/s 148 of theActdated21,07.70727bearingNo. ITBA/AST/M/148_1/2022-23/1043986651(1) issuedby the respondent No.1 for the assessment year|2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A3.
5,Issue a writ of Certiorarit or direction in the nature ofwrit of Certiorari quasning the order passed U/s 147Of|theActdated17,01,70274bearingDINNo. LTBA/PNL/F/271(1)(c)/2023-24/10596557837(1)issued by tne respondent No.2 for the assessment|year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A4. writ of Certiorari quasning the order passed U/s 147Of|theActdated17,01,70274bearingDINNo. LTBA/PNL/F/271(1)(c)/2023-24/10596557837(1)issued by tne respondent No.2 for the assessment|year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A4.
6.Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature Of|writ of Certiorari quashing the penalty order u/s|2/1(1)(c) of the Act dated 12.01.2024 bearing DIN|No. ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)C/20235-24/1059657837(1)by the Respondent No.2 for the Assessment year|2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A535writ of Certiorari quashing the penalty order u/s|2/1(1)(c) of the Act dated 12.01.2024 bearing DIN|No. ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)C/20235-24/1059657837(1)by the Respondent No.2 for the Assessment year|2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A535
J]Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature Of|a writ of Certiorari quashing the penalty order u/s|2/1(1)(b) of the Act dated 15.11.2023 bearing DIN|No. LTBA/PNL/F/271(1)(Db)/2023-24/1057973198(1and11.01.2074,bearing|DINNo. TBA/PNL/F/271(1)(D)/20235-24/1059638009(1), bythe Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2015-16°hereinmarkedaS|Annexure-A6andA /respectively.|a writ of Certiorari quashing the penalty order u/s|2/1(1)(b) of the Act dated 15.11.2023 bearing DIN|No. LTBA/PNL/F/271(1)(Db)/2023-24/1057973198(1and11.01.2074,bearing|DINNo. TBA/PNL/F/271(1)(D)/20235-24/1059638009(1), bythe Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2015-16°hereinmarkedaS|Annexure-A6andA /respectively.|
8.Pass such other orders as this Hon’bple Court Geemsfit ana proper in the interest ofjustice and eguity.fit ana proper in the interest ofjustice and eguity.
NC: 2024:KHC-K:7468WP No. 201050 of 2024
? The lis in the present matter is covered by the|
decision of this Court in the case ofSankuratri
Venkateshwara Rao vs. [ncome Tax Officer and|
others[T]As such, this Writ Petition would be|
required to be allowed. Hence, I pass the following:
ORDER
4$The Writ Petition is allowed,
44$A|certiorarl ISissued,tne|noticedated|29.03.2021 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A is.quashed.29.03.2021 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A is.quashed.
444$A|certiorarl ISissued,tne|noticedated|26.05.2022 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-Al is.quashed.26.05.2022 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-Al is.quashed.
4C$Acertiorar].ISissued,tne|noticedated|21.07.2022 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A2 is.quashed.21.07.2022 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A2 is.quashed.
C$A|certiorarl ISissued,tne|noticedated|21.07.2022 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A3 is.quashed.21.07.2022 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A3 is.quashed.
NC: 2024:KHC-K:7468WP No. 201050 of 2024
C4$A|certiorarl IS.issued,the|orderdated|12.05.2023 issued by respondent No.2 for the.assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A4 Isquashed.12.05.2023 issued by respondent No.2 for the.assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A4 Isquashed.
4C$Acertiorar].ISissued,tne|noticedated|21.07.2022 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A2 is.quashed.21.07.2022 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A2 is.quashed.
C$A|certiorarl ISissued,tne|noticedated|21.07.2022 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A3 is.quashed.21.07.2022 issued by respondent No.1 for the)assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A3 is.quashed.
NC: 2024:KHC-K:7468WP No. 201050 of 2024
C4$A|certiorarl IS.issued,the|orderdated|12.05.2023 issued by respondent No.2 for the.assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A4 Isquashed.12.05.2023 issued by respondent No.2 for the.assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A4 Isquashed.
C44$A certiorari is issued, the penalty order dated|12.01.2024 issued by respondent No.2 for the.assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A5 Isquashed.12.01.2024 issued by respondent No.2 for the.assessment year 2015-16 at Annexure-A5 Isquashed.
C444$A certiorari is issued, the penalty orders dated|15.11.7073.and.11.01.7074|ISSUEC|DY|respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2015-16 at Annexures-A6 and A/ are quashed.|15.11.7073.and.11.01.7074|ISSUEC|DY|respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2015-16 at Annexures-A6 and A/ are quashed.|
PRS|List No.: 2 S| No.: 22|
Sd/-|(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.