Case LawHigh Court › Wp/102094/2022 Of Quest Global Engineeri...

Wp/102094/2022 Of Quest Global Engineering Services Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 19 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/102094/2022 Of Quest Global Engineering Services Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/102094/2022 Of Quest Global Engineering Services Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Resultantly, the Writ Petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Digitally signed byTHEJASKUMAR NLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI -WRIT PETITION NO. 102094 OF 2022 (TIT) BETWEEN: QUEST GLOBAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, NO.437/A, PLOT NO.2, AEQUS SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE, HATTARAGI VILLAGE, HUKKERI TALUKA, BELAGAVI, KARNATAKA-591 245, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. RAMAN SUBRAMANIAN, AGE: 59 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.R.PRADEEP AND MS. GIRIJA.G.P., ADVOCATES) AND: 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1, BELAGAVI, FEROZ KHIMJIBHAI COMPLEX, OPP. CIVIL HOSPITAL, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI-590 001. 2. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HUBBALLI, C.R. BUILDING, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI-580 025. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M.THIRUMALESH., ADVOCATE FOR R1-R2) - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:13374WP No. 102094 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.K.R.Pradeep., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.M. Thirumalesh., counsel for the respondents have appeared through video conferencing. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order dated 31.03.2022 passed by the first respondent under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in DIN & Notice No.ITBA/AST/F/148A/2021-22/1042401411(1) for the Assessment Year 2018-19 vide Annexure-B and the notice dated 31.03.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in DIN & Notice No.ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2021-22/1042401760(1) for the Assessment Year 2018-19 vide Annexure-A. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with utmost care. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:13374 4. On 30.11.2018, the petitioner filed an original return of income declaring a total income of Rs.26,79,19,590/- (Rupees Twenty-Six Crore Seventy-Nine Lakh Nineteen Thousand Five Hundred and Ninety only) for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The case of the petitioner was selected for scrutiny and a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued by the Income Tax Department. On 30.09.2021, a draft order was passed by the first respondent under Section 143(3) R/w Section 144C(1) of the Act determining the assessed income at Rs.116,37,79,303/- for the Assessment Year 2018-19. On 19.03.2022, a notice was issued under Section 148A(b) of the Act for the Assessment Year 2018-19 proposing to make disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) of the Act seeking compliance before 25.03.2022. A Corrigendum to Notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act was issued altering the compliance date to 26.03.2022. The petitioner replied to the notice. Suffice it to note that the department issued 148A(b) notice to Quest Global Engineering Services Private Limited on 19.03.2022 and an order under Clause (d) of Section 148A of the Act was passed on 31.03.2022. Subsequently, a notice - 4 - under Section 148 of the Act was also issued on 31.03.2022. It is pivotal to note that as of the date of issuance of (b) notice and (d) order, the regular assessment was in progress and had not reached finality. Hence, issuance of (b) notice, passing of (d) order and notice under Section 148 of the Act are bad in law. Therefore, they are liable to be set aside, so they are set aside. 5. The Writ of Certiorari is ordered. The order dated 31.03.2022 passed by the first respondent under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in DIN & Notice No.ITBA/AST/F/148A/2021-22/1042401411(1) for the Assessment Year 2018-19 vide Annexure-B and the notice dated 31.03.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in DIN & Notice No.ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2021-22/1042401760(1) for the Assessment Year 2018-19 vide Annexure-A are quashed. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is allowed. TKN LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 21 Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan