Wp/11636/2024 Of M/S Azeem Infinite Dwelling India Pvt Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
02 Jul 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/11636/2024 Of M/S Azeem Infinite Dwelling India Pvt Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
02 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/11636/2024 Of M/S Azeem Infinite Dwelling India Pvt Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) decided the matter under Section 144, Section 147, Section 148, Section 156 of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1042426979(1) DATED 1.4.2022 PASSED UNDER SECTION 148A(d) OF THE ACT BY THE R1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE NOTICE NO.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned byVIDYA G RLocation:HIGH COURTOFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2 DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
-WRIT PETITION NO. 11636 OF 2024 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
1. M/S AZEEM INFINITE DWELLING INDIA PVT LTD
NO.6, G M PEARL, 1 PHASE,
BTM LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 068,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI GULAM MUKTHIYAR SRI GULAM MUKTHIYAR
S/O LATE GULAM RASOOL
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956.
… PETITIONER
(BY SMT VANI H., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1)(1) BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6 BLOCK, WARD 1(1)(1) BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6 BLOCK,
WARD 1(1)(1) BMTC BUILDING,
NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE,
KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 001
2. ASSESSMENT UNIT
NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTER,
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,
REP. BY INCOME TAX OFFICER
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE,
NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. DILIP, JUNIOR STANDING COUNSEL)
- 2 -
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER BEARING DIN AND ORDER NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1042426979(1) DATED 1.4.2022 PASSED UNDER SECTION 148A(d) OF THE ACT BY THE R1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE NOTICE NO. ITBA/AST/S/148 1/2022-23/1042428576(1) DATED 1.4.2022 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 148 BY THE R1 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner has challenged the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act for brevity) at Annexure-'A' dated 01.04.2022, the notice issued under Section 148 at Annexure-'B' dated 01.04.2022, the Assessment Order passed under Section 147 read with Section 144 read with Section 144B at Annexure-'D' dated 26.02.2024, the notice of demand issued under Section 156 at Annexure-'E' dated 26.02.2024 and the notice of penalty issued under Section 274 read with Section 272A(1)(d) at Annexure-'F' dated 26.02.2024.
- 3 -
NC: 2024:KHC:24862
2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner has not been communicated with the notice which has culminated in the passing of Assessment Order and that the E-mail ID referred to in the Assessment Order refers to the E-mail ID previously created by the earlier Accountant who has left the services of the Company and in light of the same, all correspondences and notices addressed to the E-mail ID referred to in the Assessment Order as having been communicated, the entirety of proceedings are vitiated by the violation of principles of natural justice and that the petitioner may be granted an opportunity to respond to the notice issued under Section 148A(b) and the petitioner would cooperate in the conclusion of proceedings expeditiously.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo enclosing copy of the notice dated 15.03.2022 issued under Section 148A(b) to the petitioner.
4. Taking note of the memo filed and submission made and in particular, to the E-mail ID to which the correspondences and notices have been sent being that of the former Accountant who is no longer in the services of the Company, it would meet the ends of justice to relegate the petitioner to the stage of reply to notice under section 148A(b) of the Act dated 15.03.2022.
5. In light of the above, Annexure-'A' dated 01.04.2022, Annexure-'B' dated 01.04.2022, Annexure-'D' dated 26.02.2024, Annexure-'E' dated 26.02.2024 and Annexure-'F' dated 26.02.2024 are set aside. The matter is remitted to the stage of Section 148A(b).
Accordingly, the petition is disposed off.
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.