Wp/13598/2024 Of Shivali Credit Co-Operative Society Limited v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
19 Jun 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/13598/2024 Of Shivali Credit Co-Operative Society Limited v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
19 Jun 2024
Assessment year(s)
2016-17, 2016-2017
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/13598/2024 Of Shivali Credit Co-Operative Society Limited v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedby KIRANKUMAR RLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
-WRIT PETITION NO. 13598 OF 2024 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
SHIVALI CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959, REPRESENTED BY PRAKASH KARANTH VICE PRESIDENT, Ist FLOOR, SHIROOR MUTT BUILDING, RAJANGANA ROAD UDUPI UDUPI - 576 101, PAN AADAS630 6F ALSO AT PRAKASH KARATH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O LAKSHMINARAYAN KARATH NO.7-498,. MEENA LAXMI NITTUR POST, NITTUR UDUPI - 576 103.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI RAVISHANKAR S.V, ADV.)
AND:
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER ITO WARD 1 AND TPS, AAYAKA BHAVAN, MALPE ROAD, AADIUDUPI AMBALAPADI, (PO), UDUPI - 576 103.
2. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTREADDITIONAL/ JOINT/ DEPUTY / ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX / INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT MINISTRY OF FINANCE ROOM NO.401 2nd FLOOR E RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM,
DELHI - 110 003.
3. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THE OFFICE OF THE OF INCOME TAX, THE OFFICE OF THE
PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX, C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
(BY SRI M.THIRUMALESH, ADV.)
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148A(b) OF THE ACT DTD 07.02.23 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/22-23/1049487665(1) ISSUED BY THE R1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
1. The petitioner has assailed the validity of notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) issued for the assessment year 2016-2017 at Annexure - A and also the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act at Annexure - A1, notice under Section 148 of the Act at Annexure - A2, order passed under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Act at Annexure - A3, penalty notice at Annexure - A4 and order under Section 151 of the Act at Annexure - A5.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the very notice under Section 148A(b) has been addressed to the e-mail
- 3 -
id of the earlier Chartered Accountant, which was ' '. It is submitted that as on 31.03.2022 itself, the petitioner had used the e-mail id for reference as is evidenced from the Profile at Annexure - C wherein the primary e-mail id was that of the Principal Officer of the Company and was ' '. It is on such sole ground, it is submitted that notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act having gone to the wrong e-mail id, all proceedings pursuant thereto including order under Section 148A(d) of the Act leading to notice under Section 148 of the Act and assessment order and subsequent proceedings are required to be set-aside as being one without notice to the petitioner.
3. Taking note of the Profile of the assessee at Annexure-C which shows the e-mail id of the petitioner to be that of the Principal Officer as referred to above, clearly the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act issued to the e-mail id of the previous Chartered Accountant as noticed, has resulted in no service of notice to the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, in the light of the defect in communication and intimation of notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, the
entirety of the proceedings right from notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act at Annexure - A, order under Section 148A(d) of the Act at Annexure - A1, notice under Section 148 at Annexure - A2, order under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Act at Annexure - A3, penalty notice at Annexure - A4 and order under Section 151 of the Act at Annexure - A5, are set-aside.
4. Accordingly, in the light of the defect in communication and intimation of notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, the
entirety of the proceedings right from notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act at Annexure - A, order under Section 148A(d) of the Act at Annexure - A1, notice under Section 148 at Annexure - A2, order under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Act at Annexure - A3, penalty notice at Annexure - A4 and order under Section 151 of the Act at Annexure - A5, are set-aside.
5. Liberty is reserved to take appropriate action as regards Section 148A(b) of the Act.
6. Further, the contention that the petitioner claims income to be exempt and accordingly was not aware of other posts on the portal requires to be accepted.
7. All contentions are kept open. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off.
SD/- JUDGE
DN
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.