Case LawHigh Court › Wp/13846/2024 Of Yallampalli Venkatarama...

Wp/13846/2024 Of Yallampalli Venkataramanappa Manjunath v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 11 Jun 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/13846/2024 Of Yallampalli Venkataramanappa Manjunath v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Jun 2024
Assessment year(s)
2017-2018
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/13846/2024 Of Yallampalli Venkataramanappa Manjunath v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signedby V KRISHNALocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA NC: 2024:KHC:20502 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11 DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV -WRIT PETITION NO. 13846 OF 2024 (TIT) BETWEEN: YALLAMPALLI VENKATARAMANAPPA MANJUNATH, S/O Y. VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 16TH WARD, NEAR HEALTH QUARTERS, BAGEPALLI - 561 207, CHICKBALLAPURA DIST. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R. RAMA MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND: THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, YASHODA COMPLEX, B.B. ROAD, CHICKBALLAPURA - 562 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M. DILIP, JR. STANDING COUNSEL) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 29.01.2024 ISSUED U/S 148A (b) OF THE ACT (ANNEXURE-A)TBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2023-24/1060205164(1) ISSUED FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-2018 BY THE RESPONDENT AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The petitioner has sought for quashing the notice dated 29.01.2024 issued under Section 148A (b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') as well as the order passed under Section 148A (d) of the Act and the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not previously an assessee and the notice stated to have been issued has not been received and accordingly was unable to make his objections to the notice under Section 148A (b) of the Act resulting in order being passed under Section 148A (d) of the Act without a reply on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Various contentions have been raised including that what is taken note of in the notice issued under Section 148A (b) of the Act is the entirety of the cash deposits and withdrawals in his account. It is submitted that what ought to be taken note of is the income that has escaped assessment. Other contentions are raised on merits as well, including that the procedure to be followed is that under Section 144B read with Section 151A of the Act and accordingly, the proceedings initiated are one without jurisdiction. 4. However, noticing that there was no reply by the petitioner and that the petitioner is not an assessee, it would be appropriate taking note of absence of the petitioner to afford an opportunity to participate in the proceedings by making out a reply to the notice issued under Section 148A (d) of the Act. Such reply to be made within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, the order at Annexure-'B' passed under Section 148A (d) of the Act as well as notice at Annexure-'C' issued under Section 148 of the Act are set aside. Matter is remitted back for the stage of reply to the notice issued under Section 148A (b) of the Act. All NC: 2024:KHC:20502 WP No. 13846 of 2024 contentions as raised in the present petition are kept open. Accordingly, petition is disposed off. Sd/- JUDGE MCR
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan