Wp/14814/2024 Of Sharana Basava v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
07 Aug 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/14814/2024 Of Sharana Basava v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
07 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/14814/2024 Of Sharana Basava v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the result, pass the following: ORDER (i) The petition is hereby allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Digitally signed byREKHA RLocation: High Courtof Karnataka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7 DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
-WRIT PETITION NO. 14814 OF 2024 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
1. SHARANA BASAVA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O. SHANKARAPPA NO.33, GROUND FLOOR 2 MAIN ROAD BAMBOO GARDEN MANJUNATHA NAGAR MAIN ROAD BEHIND LABOUR OFFICE NAGASANDRA POST BENGALURU - 560 073 …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR S.V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 5 (3) (5) BANGALORE - 560032
2. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE ADDITIONAL/ JOINT / DEPUTY / ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX / INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE ROOM NO 401, 2 FLOOR, E RAMP, JAWARHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM DELHI - 110003
3. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX THE OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THE OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CR BUILDING
BANGALORE - 560001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. Y.V. RAVI RAJ, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148A(B) OF THE ACT, DATED 22/03/2022 BEARING DIN NO.ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2021-22/1041260747(1), ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
“i) Issue a writ of certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act dated 22/03/2022 bearing DIN No.ITBA / AST / F / 148A(SCN) / 2021-22 / 1041260747(1) issued by the respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A.
ii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148A(d) of the Act dated 30/03/2022 bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/F/148A/2021-22/1042173069(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A1.
iii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under
section 148 of the Act, dated 30/03/2022 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2021-22/1042178383(1), issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A2.
iv) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order passed u/s 147 r.w.s 144, 144B dated 02/03/2023 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/147/2022-23/1050345344(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A3.
v) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act dated 21/09/2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(b)/2023-24/1056377816(1) issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A4.
vi) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under Section 271(1)(b) of the Act dated 22/09/2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(C) /2023-24/1056442504(1) issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A5.
vii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under Section 271F of the Act dated 21/09/2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/PNL/F/271F/2023-24/1056377814(1) issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A6.
viii) And pass such other orders as this Hon’ble court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.”
vi) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under Section 271(1)(b) of the Act dated 22/09/2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(C) /2023-24/1056442504(1) issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A5.
vii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under Section 271F of the Act dated 21/09/2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/PNL/F/271F/2023-24/1056377814(1) issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2015-16 herein marked as Annexure-A6.
viii) And pass such other orders as this Hon’ble court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that notices issued by the respondents under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘IT Act’), dated 22.03.2022 was not received by petitioner and he was not aware of the notice and consequently, petitioner could not submit its reply / response along with documents to the said notice. It is submitted that the inability and omission on the part of the petitioner to submit reply / response along with documents to the Section 148A(b) notice was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and as such, if one more opportunity is provided to the petitioner to do so by setting aside the impugned orders and notices, the petitioner would do so and respondents may be directed to proceed further in accordance with law.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed.
5. A perusal of the impugned order will indicate that it is an undisputed fact that petitioner has not submitted reply / response along with documents to Section 148A(b) notice. Under these circumstances, in view of the specific assertion on the part of the petitioner that his inability and omission to submit a reply along with documents to Section 148A(b) notice was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and if one more opportunity is granted, petitioner would submit reply along with documents, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order at Annexure-A1 dated 30.03.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the IT Act and subsequent notice / orders, etc., and remit the matter back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh from the stage of submitting of reply by the petitioner to Section 148A(b) notice and to proceed further in accordance with law.
6. In the result, pass the following:
ORDER
(i) The petition is hereby allowed.
(ii) Impugned notices / orders at Annexures - A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 and A6 are hereby set aside.
(iii) Matter is remitted back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law from the stage of submitting of reply to the Show Cause Notice under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act at Annexure-A dated 22.03.2022.
(iv) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit replies, responses, pleadings, documents, etc., to the respondent, who shall consider the same, provide sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and proceed further in accordance with law.
Sd/-
(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.