Case LawHigh Court › Wp/18126/2024 Of Smt Hema Jayashekar v....

Wp/18126/2024 Of Smt Hema Jayashekar v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 09 Jul 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/18126/2024 Of Smt Hema Jayashekar v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
09 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
2019-20
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Wp/18126/2024 Of Smt Hema Jayashekar v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byYAMUNA K LLocation:High Court ofKarnataka IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9 DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV -WRIT PETITION NO. 18126 OF 2024 (TIT)BETWEEN: SMT. HEMA JAYASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. BANGARU JAYASHEKAR, SHANTHA NILAYA, 2ND MAIN ROAD, VIDYARANYAPURAM, MYSURU - 570 008, PAN: . …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANNAMALAI S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 1(2), BLR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 095. 6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 095. 2. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 1(1), BLR BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 095. BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 095. 3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), BENGALURU, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 095. (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED UNDER SECTION 147 READ WITH SECTION 144 OF THE ACT DATED 29.01.2024 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1060203033(1) ISSUED BY THE R-1 FOR THE AY 2019-20 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A1 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel Sri. E.I. Sanmathi accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has called in question the correctness of the assessment order under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') at Annexure-'A1' as well as the demand notice at Annexure-'A3', draft order at Annexure-'A4', penalty notices at Annexures-'A5' and 'A6', notices under Section 148A(b) of the Act at Annexures-'B1' and 'B2', order under Section 148A(d) of the Act at Annexure-'B3' and notice under Section 148 of the Act at Annexure-'B4'. 3. The case of the petitioner is that in terms of the information available in the portal pertaining to the petitioner, email ID is , however all of the proceedings beginning from the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act have been addressed to . Accordingly, it is submitted that none of the proceedings were communicated to the petitioner and accordingly, petitioner has not participated in any of the proceedings that have culminated. Specific reference is made to the bank statement of the petitioner at Annexure-'J1' and to the credit entries and it is pointed out that such remittance which is the subject matter of reassessment are credit entries by virtue of the payment made by the husband whose bank statement is also produced at Annexure-'J2'. 4. Accordingly, it is submitted that proceedings initiated could be dropped if the petitioner is given an - 4 - opportunity to demonstrate that much of the remittance taken note of are remittance from the petitioner's husband. 5. Taking note of the stand as made out by the petitioner and that the proceedings culminated in the absence of petitioner, wherein ex-parte order was passed, it would be appropriate to keep all the contentions open and relegate the matter to the stage of notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act. 4. Accordingly, it is submitted that proceedings initiated could be dropped if the petitioner is given an - 4 - opportunity to demonstrate that much of the remittance taken note of are remittance from the petitioner's husband. 5. Taking note of the stand as made out by the petitioner and that the proceedings culminated in the absence of petitioner, wherein ex-parte order was passed, it would be appropriate to keep all the contentions open and relegate the matter to the stage of notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act. 6. Accordingly, the order at Annexure-'A1', computation sheet at Annexure-'A2', demand notices at Annexure-'A3', draft order at Annexure-'A4', penalty notices at Annexures-'A5' and 'A6', notices under Section 148A(b) of the Act at Annexure-'B1' and 'B2', order under Section 148A(d) of the Act at Annexure-'B3' and notice under Section 148 of the Act at 'B4' are set aside. Matter is relegated to the stage of reply to the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act. The petitioner to appear before respondent No.1 on 22.07.2024. 7. I.A.No.1/2024 is allowed. The production of original or certified copy of Annexures-A1 to A6 and B1 to B4 is dispensed with. 8. Accordingly, petition is disposed off. Sd/- JUDGE MCR
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan