Wp/22544/2024 Of Irafan Shareef v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department
High Court
20 Aug 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/22544/2024 Of Irafan Shareef v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department
Date of order
20 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
2020-21
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/22544/2024 Of Irafan Shareef v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of consensus arrived at, this Writ Petition is allowed interms of order passed in W.P.No.13353 of 2024 and batch.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAULANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NOt 22544 OF 2024
Between:
lrafan Shareef, S/o. Hassan Shareef age. 39 Years, Add. 12-2-41614,Ushodya Colony, Mehidipatnam, Asif nagar, Hyderabad 500028 Telangana
...PETITIONER
AND
1Assessment Unit, lncome Tax. Department, National e-Assessment Centre,New Delhi, Room No. 401, 2no Floor, E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium,New Delhi-1 10003New Delhi, Room No. 401, 2no Floor, E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium,New Delhi-1 10003
2. The lncome Tax Officer, lnternational Taxation-1, Ayakar Bhavan, Hyderabad,Telangana-500001Telangana-500001
3. The Commissioner of lncome Tax, (lT &TP), Hyderabad Ayakar BhavanBasheerbagh Hyderabad Telangana - 500004Basheerbagh Hyderabad Telangana - 500004
.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order orDirection, declaring that the order passed by the 2"d Respondent, u/s 148A(d) ofthe lncome Tax Act, 1961, dated 31.03.2024 bearing DIN and NoticeITBA/AST/F/148 N2O23-2411O6374O947(1) for the Assessment Year 202O-21 asarbitrary, illegal, bad in law, void-ab-initio, violative of the principles of naturaljustice, apart from being violative of Articles 1 a, 1 9( 1 )(g) and 265 of theconstitution of India and Sec 1484 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 , and toconsequently set aside the same in the interests of lustice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated [in]the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased ]to stayall further proceedings, including any recovery pursuant to the order [passed ]bythe 2nd respondent under section 148A (d) of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 dated 31 [-]03 - 2024 bearing DIN and Notice No ITBtuAST/F |14BN2O23-24110637 40947(1)for the assessment year 2020-21, pending disposal of the above Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A. KIRAN MANOHARCounsel for the Respondents: MS. BOKARO SAPNA REDDY(Jr. SC FOR INCOME TAx)
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.22544 of 2024
ORDER (per Hon'ble SP,J)
Sri A.Kiran Manohar, learned counsel, appears for the petitionerand Ms.B.Sapna Reddy, learned Junior Standing Counsel for Income TaxDepartment, appears for the respondents.
With the consent finally heard.
3. Learned counsel for the parties fairly and [jointly ]urge that the pointinvolved in this case is squarely covered by order passed by this Court inW.P.No.13353 of 2024 and batch and it may be allowed in terms of tJle saidorder.
4 . In view of consensus arrived at, this Writ Petition is allowed interms of order passed in W.P.No.13353 of 2024 and batch. The directioncontained in the said order shall apply mutatis mutandis to this case withfull force. No costs.
/
II
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:2010812024
ORDER
WP.No.22544 of 2024
ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS
@sd*
([9l''][ 1lrf ] [l,i ][,-][{-]Ja;,I7 1 [ttl ][2021]\\ilD,:.ir'.. r C!(;o
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.