Wp/23969/2024 Of Gowdru Murudeshappa Basavarajappa v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
23 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/23969/2024 Of Gowdru Murudeshappa Basavarajappa v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
23 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
2015-2016, 2015-16
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/23969/2024 Of Gowdru Murudeshappa Basavarajappa v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the result, I pass the following: ORDER (i) The petition is hereby allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
-WRIT PETITION NO. 23969 OF 2024 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
1. GOWDRU MURUDESHAPPA BASAVARAJAPPA S/O GOWDRU MURDESHAPPA AGED 44 YEARS CHIKKABANIHATTI HOSAKERE, JAGALUR, DAVANAGERE-577528
…PETITIONER
AND:
(BY SRI. R. RAMA MURTHY, ADVOCATE)
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, SHREE TOWERS HADADI MAIN ROAD OPP. TO DRR HOSPITAL DAVANAGERE-577 002.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signedby DEVIKA MTHIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND Location: HIGHCOURT OF227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE KARNATAKANOTICES DATED 17.03.2022 ISSUED U/S 148A(b) OF THE ACT (ANNX-A) DIN (ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2021-22/1040972071(1) ISSUED FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-2016 BY THE RESPONDENT. QUASH THE ORDER DATED 28.03.2022 MADE U/S 148A(d) OF THE ACT, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-2016 (ANNX-B) IN DIN ITBA/AST/F/148A/2021-22/1041798042(1) BY THE RESPONDENT. QUASH THE NOTICE ISSUED U/S 148 OF THE ACT DATED 29.03.2022 ISSUED FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 (ANNX-C) DIN ITBA/AST/S/148-1/2021-22/1041901811(1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. QUASH THE EX-PARTY ORDER OF ASSESSMENT DATED 14.03.2024 MADE U/S 147 R.W.S 144 OF THE ACT, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 (ANNX-F) DIN
ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(C)/2023-24/1062634009(1) PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
“A. The Petitioner humbly prays this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the Notices dated 17.03.2022 issued u/s. 148A(b) of the Act (Annexure-‘A’)DIN ) [ITBA/AST/F/148A (SCN)/2021-22/1040972071(1)]issued for the assessment year 2015-2016 by the Respondent. be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the Notices dated 17.03.2022 issued u/s. 148A(b) of the Act (Annexure-‘A’)DIN ) [ITBA/AST/F/148A (SCN)/2021-22/1040972071(1)]issued for the assessment year 2015-2016 by the Respondent.
B. The Petitioner humbly prays this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the order dated 28.03.2022 made u/s. 148A(d) of the Act, for the assessment year 2015-2016 (Annexure-‘B’) in DIN ITBA/AST/F/148A/2021-22/1041798042(1) by the Respondent. be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the order dated 28.03.2022 made u/s. 148A(d) of the Act, for the assessment year 2015-2016 (Annexure-‘B’) in DIN ITBA/AST/F/148A/2021-22/1041798042(1) by the Respondent.
C. The Petitioner humbly prays this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue Writ of Certiorari or in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the notice issued u/s.148 of the Act dated 29-03-2022 issued for the assessment year 2015-16 (Annexure-‘C’) DIN ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2021-22/1041901811(1)issued by the Respondent. be pleased to issue Writ of Certiorari or in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the notice issued u/s.148 of the Act dated 29-03-2022 issued for the assessment year 2015-16 (Annexure-‘C’) DIN ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2021-22/1041901811(1)issued by the Respondent.
D. The Petitioner humbly pray this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the ex-parte order of assessment dated 14-03-2024 made u/s. be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the ex-parte order of assessment dated 14-03-2024 made u/s.
147 r.w.s.144 of the Act, for the assessment year 2015-16 (Annexure-‘F’)DIN 2015-16 (Annexure-‘F’)DIN
ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(c)/2023-24/1062634009(1)
passed by the Respondent.
D. The Petitioner humbly pray this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the ex-parte order of assessment dated 14-03-2024 made u/s. be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the ex-parte order of assessment dated 14-03-2024 made u/s.
147 r.w.s.144 of the Act, for the assessment year 2015-16 (Annexure-‘F’)DIN 2015-16 (Annexure-‘F’)DIN
ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(c)/2023-24/1062634009(1)
passed by the Respondent.
E. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue such other relief or relief's as this Hon’ble Court deems fit, in the interest of justice, in the Petitioner’s case”. other relief or relief's as this Hon’ble Court deems fit, in the interest of justice, in the Petitioner’s case”.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material on record.
3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that notice issued by the respondent under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘IT Act’), dated 17.03.2022 was not received by petitioner and he was not aware of the notice and consequently, petitioner could not submit its reply / response along with documents to the said notice. It is submitted that the inability and omission on the part of the petitioner to submit reply / response along with documents to the Section 148A(b) notice was due to
bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and as such, if one more opportunity is provided to the petitioner to do so by setting aside the impugned orders and notices, the petitioner would do so and respondent may be directed to proceed further in accordance with law.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed.
5. A perusal of the impugned order will indicate that it is an undisputed fact that petitioner has not submitted reply / response along with documents to Section 148A(b) notice. Under these circumstances, in view of the specific assertion on the part of the petitioner that his inability and omission to submit a reply along with documents to Section 148A(b) notice was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and if one more opportunity is granted, petitioner would submit reply along with documents, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order at Annexure-B dated 28.03.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the IT Act and subsequent notice / orders, etc., and remit the matter back to respondent for reconsideration afresh
from the stage of submitting of reply by the petitioner to Section
148A(b) notice and to proceed further in accordance with law.
6. In the result, I pass the following:
ORDER
(i) The petition is hereby allowed.
(ii) Impugned notices / orders at Annexures B, C, and F are hereby set aside. and F are hereby set aside.
(iii) Matter is remitted back to respondent for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law from the stage of submitting of reply to the Show Cause Notice under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act at Annexure-A dated 17.03.2022. reconsideration afresh in accordance with law from the stage of submitting of reply to the Show Cause Notice under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act at Annexure-A dated 17.03.2022.
(iv) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit replies, responses, pleadings, documents, etc., to the respondent, who shall consider the same, provide sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and proceed further in accordance with law.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.