Wp/26469/2024 Of Sri Holalkere Basavarajappa Nagaraja v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
30 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/26469/2024 Of Sri Holalkere Basavarajappa Nagaraja v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
30 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/26469/2024 Of Sri Holalkere Basavarajappa Nagaraja v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Digitallysigned byANAND NLocation:HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR -WRIT PETITION NO. 26469 OF 2024 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
SRI HOLALKERE BASAVARAJAPPA NAGARAJA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O. LATE BASAVARAJAPPA, R/AT 5TH CROSS, SIDDARAMAPPA EXTENSION, HOLALKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA-577 526. PAN , PREVIOUSLY AT NO.55, C.B. ROAD, PWD GOVERNMENT SCHOOL OPP., E DIVISION, HOLALKERE, HOLALKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 526.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR S V.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, CHITRADURGA-577 502. WARD-1, CHITRADURGA-577 502.
2.NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO. 401, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI-110 003.
3.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 THE OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 095.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148A(b) OF THE ACT, DATED 18/01/2023 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A(sCN)/2022-23/1048880408(1), ISSUED BY THE R1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17 HEREIN MARKED AS ANN-A ii) QUASH THE ORDER UNDER SECTION 148A(d) OF THE ACT, DATED 24/02/2023, BEARING DIN NO ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1050112981(1) ISSUED BY THE R1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17 HEREIN MARKED AS ANN-A1 iii) QUASH THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE ACT DATED 27/03/2023 BEARING DIN NO ITBA/AST/S/148.1/2022-23/1051365458(1) ISSUED BY THE R1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17 HEREIN MARKED AS ANN-A2.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under section 148A(b) of the Act, dated 18/01/2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022-23/1048880408(1), issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A.
ii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order under section 148A(d) of the Act, dated 24/02/2023, bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1050112981(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A1.
iii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148 of the Act dated 27/03/2023 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022-23/1051365458(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A2.
iv) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order passed
under section 147 r.w.s 144, 144B dated 13/03/2024 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1062564498(1) issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - AЗ.
v) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty notice under Section 274 r.w.s 271(1)(b) of the Act dated 13/03/2024 bearing DIN
No.ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(b)/2023-24/1062564635(1) issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A4.
vi) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty notice under Section 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c) of the Act dated 13/03/2024 bearing DIN No.ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(c)/2023-24/1062564636(1) issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A5.
v) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty notice under Section 274 r.w.s 271(1)(b) of the Act dated 13/03/2024 bearing DIN
No.ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(b)/2023-24/1062564635(1) issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A4.
vi) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty notice under Section 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c) of the Act dated 13/03/2024 bearing DIN No.ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(c)/2023-24/1062564636(1) issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A5.
vii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty notice under Section 274 r.w.s 271F of the Act dated 13/03/2024 bearing DIN No.ITBA/PNL/S/271F/2023-24/1062564638(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A6.
- 5 -
viii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice of outstanding demand dated 02/05/2024 bearing DIN No. ITBA/RCV/F/17/2024- 25/1064596010(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure A7.
2. Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the material on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause, the petitioner could not submit his reply to the notices dated 12.12.2023, 08.01.2024, 06.02.2024, 21.02.2024 and 28.02.2024 and as such, the impugned order at Annexure-A3 dated 13.03.2024 deserves to be set aside in order to give the petitioner one more opportunity to submit his reply and contest the proceedings.
4. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.
5. A perusal of the impugned order at Annexure-A3 dated
13.03.2024 will indicate that the petitioner has not submitted his
- 6 -
reply to the aforesaid notices and the impugned order is an ex parte order. Under these circumstances, adopting justice oriented approach and in the light of the specific assertion on the part of the petitioner that his inability and omission to submit his reply to the aforesaid notices was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order at Annexure-A3 and the subsequent notices at Annexures - A4, A5 and A6 and remit the matter back to the stage of the petitioner submitting a reply to the aforesaid notices and to proceed further in accordance with law.
6. In the result, the following:
ORDER
A. The petition is allowed.
B. The impugned order and notices at Annexures -
A3, A4, A5 and A6 are set aside.
C. The matter is remitted back to the petitioner
submitting his reply to the notices dated 12.12.2023, 08.01.2024, 06.02.2024, 21.02.2024 12.12.2023, 08.01.2024, 06.02.2024, 21.02.2024
and 28.02.2024 and to proceed further in
NC: 2024:KHC:40715
WP No. 26469 of 2024
accordance with law by providing sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner.
Sd/-
(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
RB
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.