Wp/28449/2023 Of Mrs. Sowbhagyamma v. The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
25 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/28449/2023 Of Mrs. Sowbhagyamma v. The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/28449/2023 Of Mrs. Sowbhagyamma v. The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the result, I pass the following:- ORDER (i) Petition is hereby allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedbyLEELAVATHI SRLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR -WRIT PETITION NO. 28449 OF 2023 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
MRS. SOWBHAGYAMMA, W/O LATE SATISH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, KATTALE BELU, KYTHASANDRA POST, TUMKUR 572 104, KARNATAKA
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. KEERTHI PRASAD D C.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKARNATAKA AND GOA, C R BUILDING, NO.1, QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001. KARNATAKA AND GOA, C R BUILDING, NO.1, QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001.
2. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO. 1 & TPS, TUMAKURU, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR, TUMAKURU. WARD NO. 1 & TPS, TUMAKURU, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR, TUMAKURU.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.E I SANMATHI.,ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE NOTICE DTD 27.01.2023 DIN NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN) /2022-23/1049200529(1) BY THE R-2 AT ANNX-A TO THIS WP AND QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED BY HTE R-2 UNDER SECTION 148A(D) OF THE INCOME TAX AXT 1961 VIDE DIN NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1051042645(1) DTD 21.03.2023 AT ANNX-C TO THIS WP AND QUASHING THE NOTICE DTD 21.03.2023 DIN NO. ITBA/AST/F/148/2022-23/1051045803(1) BY R-2 AT ANNX-D.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-
“i) Issue a writ of certiorari or in the nature of writ of certiorari or any other order quashing the notice dated 27.01.2023 DIN No. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022-23/1049200529(1) by the Respondent No.2 at Annexure-A to this writ petition, in the interest of justice.
ii) Issue a writ of certiorari or in the nature of writ of certiorari or any other order quashing the order passed by the Respondent No.2 under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act 1961 vide DIN No. ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1051042645(1) dated 21.03.2023 at Annexure-C to this writ petition, in the interest of justice and equity.
iii) Issue a writ of certiorari or in the nature of writ of certiorari or any other order quashing the notice dated 21.03.2023 DIN No. ITBA/AST/F/148/2022-23/1051045803(1) by Respondent No.2 at Annexure-D in the interest of justice and equity.
iv) Issue such other writ or writs as this Hon’ble Court deem it fit, in the petitioner’s case in the interest of justice.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents – revenue and perused the material on record.
3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that in response to Section 148A(b) Notice dated 27.01.2023 issued by the 2[nd] respondent, the petitioner submitted reply on 15.02.2023 which ultimately culminated in the impugned order dated 21.03.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) followed by Notice issued under Section 148 of the I.T.Act.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that certain documents were not in the custody or in possession of the petitioner at the time of submitting reply to the Notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the I.T.Act and as such, if the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the 2[nd] respondent for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law, the petitioner would submit additional reply, documents etc., which may be directed to be considered by the 2[nd] respondents in accordance with law.
5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order and remit the matter back to the 2[nd] respondent for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law.
6. In the result, I pass the following:-
ORDER
(i) Petition is hereby allowed.
(ii) The impugned notice at Annexure-A dated 27.01.2023,
impugned order at Annexure-C dated 21.03.2023 and impugned notice at Annexure-D dated 21.03.2023 are hereby quashed.
5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order and remit the matter back to the 2[nd] respondent for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law.
6. In the result, I pass the following:-
ORDER
(i) Petition is hereby allowed.
(ii) The impugned notice at Annexure-A dated 27.01.2023,
impugned order at Annexure-C dated 21.03.2023 and impugned notice at Annexure-D dated 21.03.2023 are hereby quashed.
(iii) The matter is remitted back to the 2[nd] respondent for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law.
(iv) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit
replies, responses, pleadings, documents, etc., to the 2[nd]respondent, who shall consider the same and provide sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and proceed further in accordance with law.
Sd/-
(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
Srl.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.