Wp/462/2023 Of Ganesh Shankar Mhatre v. Income Tax Officer Ward 3(2) And Ors
High Court
27 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/462/2023 Of Ganesh Shankar Mhatre v. Income Tax Officer Ward 3(2) And Ors
Date of order
27 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/462/2023 Of Ganesh Shankar Mhatre v. Income Tax Officer Ward 3(2) And Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYPURTIDigitallysigned byPURTIPRASADCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONPRASADPARABPARABDate:2024.04.0210:56:15+0530WRIT PETITION NO. 462 OF 2023
Ganesh Shankar Mhatre
V/s.Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(2), Kalyanand Ors.
….Petitioner
…Respondents
----
Mr. Dharan Gandhi for Petitioner.Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Respondents.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATED : 27[th] MARCH 2024
P.C. :
1.Mr. Gandhi states that the issue in this petition will be coveredby the recent judgment of this Court in Godrej Industries Ltd. V/s. TheAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 14(1)(2), Mumbai and Ors.[1]Mr. Sharma agrees.
2.Therefore, impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) and the notice issued under Section 148of the Act are hereby quashed and set aside. Consequential notices ororders, if any, also stand quashed and set aside.
3.
Petition disposed.
4.Since we have disposed this petition only on the issue oflimitation, petitioner may raise the other contentions raised in this petitionindependently, if the need arise in other matters.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue