Case LawHigh Court › Wpa v. Revithi Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd

Wpa v. Revithi Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd

High Court 26 Jun 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Wpa v. Revithi Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
26 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wpa v. Revithi Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

26.06.2023.PBSl. No.20. WPA 13022 of 2023 VsAssistant Commissioner of IncomeTax, Circle – 7(1), Kolkata & Ors.Mr. Ranjit Kr. Murarka,Mr. Vivek Murarka,Mr. Dibanath Dey,Mr. S. D. Verma.… For the Petitioner.Mr. Tilak Mitra. Revithi Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. ……..for the respondent. Heard learned advocates appearing for theparties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challengedthe impugned assessment order dated 11[th] May, 2023,under Section 147 read with Section 144B of theIncome Tax Act, 1961, relating to the assessment year2013-14, which is an appellable order under thestatute and furthermore, petitioner after participatingthrough out the whole proceeding right from theinitiation of notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act byfiling objection to the same and even after acceptingthe order under Section 148A(d) of the Act andparticipating in the impugned reassessmentproceeding after the issuance of subsequent noticeunder Section 148 of the Act, now at this stage,petitioner wants to challenge the impugned appellable order of assessment under Section 147 of the Act andthe initiation of proceeding and issuance ofsubsequent notice under Section 148 of the Act bycontending the same as without jurisdiction. Petitionerhas neither challenged before this Court at the stage ofthe notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act dated 26[th]May, 2022 rather against that it appears from recordthat it filed objection to the same on 6[th] May, 2022 andthereafter order under Section 148A(d) was passed on28[th] July, 2022 and notice under Section 148 of theAct was issued on 29[th] July, 2022 and even at thatstage it did not approach this writ court and thereafternotices under Section 142(1) and 143(2) of the Actwere issued and even notice of show-cause for anyvariation of draft assessment was also served upon thepetitioner and impugned assessment order underSection 147 of the Act was passed and now at thisstage petitioner wants to challenge the initiation ofvery impugned assessment proceeding andassessment order which is an appellable order. In view of the discussions made above, I am notinclined to entertain this writ petition and accordingly,this writ petition being WPA 13022 of 2023 isdismissed. ( Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan