Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/31514/2022 Of Suhail Onattu Kattil...

Wp(C)/31514/2022 Of Suhail Onattu Kattil v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 01 Mar 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/31514/2022 Of Suhail Onattu Kattil v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
01 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
2015-16, 2015-2016
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/31514/2022 Of Suhail Onattu Kattil v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH FRIDAY, THE 1 DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 31509 OF 2022 PETITIONER/S: MOHAMMED HANEEFA ONATHU KATTIL, AGED 43 YEARS ONATHU KATTIL HOUSE, KADAMPUZHA VIAL MARAKKARA P.O. MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676518 BY ADVS.ANIL D. NAIR; TELMA RAJU; P.K.BIJU; EDATHARA VINEETA KRISHNAN; ANJANA A. RESPONDENT/S: INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION,KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673001 BY ADVS.P.G.JAYASHANKAR G.KEERTHIVAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.03.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).31514/2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH FRIDAY, THE 1 DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 31514 OF 2022 PETITIONER/S: SUHAIL ONATTU KATTIL, AGED 35 YEARS ONATHU KATTIL HOUSE, KADAMPUZHA VIAL, MARAKKARA P.O. MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676518 BY ADVS.ANIL D. NAIR; TELMA RAJU; P.K.BIJU EDATHARA VINEETA KRISHNAN; ANJANA A. RESPONDENT/S: INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673001 BY ADVS.P.G.JAYASHANKAR KEERTHIVAS GIRI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.03.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).31509/2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T [WP(C) Nos.31509/2022, 31514/2022] Mr Anil D Nair learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the prayers in these writ petitions are rendered infructuous. By placing the statement on record, the present writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGHJUDGE jjj PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 Exhibit P2 Exhibit P3 Exhibit P4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 31514/2022 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 15.03.2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE A.Y. 2015-16. TRUE COPY OF THE DRAFT ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 25.03.2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE A.Y. 2015-16. TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTIONS TO THE DRAFT ORDER FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT ON 22.04.2022 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 148A(D) DATED 31.08.2022 ALONG WITH THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE A.Y. 2015-16. PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 Exhibit P2 Exhibit P3 Exhibit P4 Exhibit P5 Exhibit P6 Exhibit P7 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 31509/2022 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT DATED 09.02.2022. TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 15.03.2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y 2015-2016 TRUE COPY OF THE DRAFT ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S 144C DATED 25.03.2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTIONS TO THE DRAFT ASSESSMENT ORDER FILED FOR THE A.Y 2015-2016 DATED 22.04.2022. TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 01.06.2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 16.06.2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 148A(D) DATED 31.08.2022 ALONG WITH THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan